My venture into the 'High End'

[Daniel_NYC]

Scraped up some cash and ventured where I have never gone before. Previously the most I ever spent was $$$and 1/2%.
read all about it here:

http://www.utopiaguide.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=6694

Cant afford to do it too frequently, but every once in a while you need to let loose!

Dan

[justlooking]

With all due respect, although $500 is a (low) "high-end" price, that doesn't sound like a real "high end"-quality experience.

No kissing? "Get comfortable" rather than easing into the sex naturally?

Sounds like an expensive "low end" session, where you pay more because she was so good-looking.

(If she learned this service model at Tower Models, makes you think that's another agency to cross off the list.)

[justlooking]

I know people are sick of hearing all this agencymongering from me, but at least when this girl was at Tower Models, you could ask the phone girl to only offer you women who kiss, so you wouldn't have to worry about wasting your money.

[Eugene]

In my opinion though, the "high end callgirls" or "movie stars" aren't any different than their normal fellow-providers. Of course it's a personal choice, and if a guy thinks he is doing it with a STAR, I guess he is paying accordingly. I'd rather find a bunch of opportunities with a few hot Spanish or Oriental young cuties, who are not stars (as of yet LOL) virtually spending the same...
But again to each his own.
Happy hunting.

[justlooking]

The point isn't doing it with a "STAR". (What's a "STAR" anyway, in this context?)

The point is doing it with someone fairly fresh, attractive, and accomodating (and usually educated and apparently middle-class, if those things matter to you) who isn't doing 10 sessions a day.

Why do people always insist on portraying the more expensive options as being something different from what they are?

[justlooking]

Or to put it another way:

No they aren't any different. They're just better-looking and more articulate.

(On the average, of course.)