She's Baaaaack - OhCharley

[littleguy]

OhCharley just posted on ***, New York she's going to be in town next week.

Any reviews guys ???

[jmcurry]

Have seen Charley once before, and I am scheduled for this trip as well. She is well worth your time, energy, and hard earned savings. I will report back with a "tasteful, but not explicit" review next week. If you can book time, "just do it."

[TuckernotSucker]

She is on my ATF list. A must see.

[One Eyed Trouser Trout]

You've been asking this question like forever dude....and the answers are always the same.

Time to just do it and have your own fabulous memory

[John Blackthorne]

Well...

I guess i know her about as well as anyone (and she doesn't return my calls either) and have seen her many times over the years.

I cannot imagine missing any chace to be with her. Unless the combination of looks, brains, talent, cheerfulness and enthusiasm she brings to the table is a problem for you.

You will never forget her.

jb

[Ozzy]

the only negitive thing about charley is that she doesn't stay long enough when she comes to NYC. 2 days in a town with 4-5 million men. perhaps you could convince her to extend her next trip thru the weekend.

a definite must see, not at all like any of the local (low class) NYC talent, and a member of ozzy's ATF list as well. ;)

[guy catelli]

WSB, i'll take your word for it: what do you think of Charley?

[Phantom]

As someone who has had the privilege, honor and extreme pleasure of once having Charley all to myself for 2 straight days, I'll have to add to the chorus of glowing reviews by giving her a big two thumbs up.

[Edited by Phantom on 02-24-2001 at 11:29 AM]

[John Blackthorne]

Just off the phone with Charley...

Flight cancellation knocked Philly out of her trip...sounds like she arrives in NYC tomorrow..and will be there til Friday sometime..

Gives you SOME more time.

but no..you cannot keep her longer.

jb

[GenrsMale]

"Have seen Charley once before, and I am scheduled for this trip as well. She is well worth your time, energy, and hard earned savings. I will report back with a "tasteful, but not explicit" review next week. If you can book time, "just do it." by JM Curry


Hey I just got off the phone with Charley to try to set something up later in the week. She told me that J M Curry was a no-show now for the third time. She says that she has never seen him even though he says so.

Who is this JM Curry ?????? I know that you are now blackballed off her list forever without EVER seeing her.....that is too bad.....you don't know what you missed.

[frog]

the plot thickens...

[badz]

.

[Edited by badz on 05-23-2001 at 10:03 PM]

[frog]

hey, my fantasies and delusions are important to me.

[badz]

.

[Edited by badz on 05-23-2001 at 10:04 PM]

[frog]

At least the mini-review seems to be accurate.

[Phantom]

frog, badz,

let you in on a little secret, there are others here who've posted that they've seen Charley also, but guess what? I hear from a very good source that they haven't.

[badz]

.

[Edited by badz on 05-23-2001 at 10:04 PM]

[Phantom]

I'm talking about others beside jmcurry.

[Edited by Phantom on 02-27-2001 at 07:37 PM]

[badz]

.

[Edited by badz on 05-23-2001 at 10:05 PM]

[jmcurry]

Sorry guys, but the facts are a little bit twisted. I have seen Charley before, using a different name, and not in New York. Why would I bother giving her a positive review if I had not seen her? Yes, some months ago I had to cancel a session with her in New York because of an emergency at work. I did not skip out on her. I called and explained that I had been called into work and had to get there quickly. That was the only time I cancelled. This time around, I have been waiting for her promised email giving me a place to call for a scheduled 4 PM appointment today since last Friday. She never emailed me a location or a number to call, so I was unable to respond. I emailed her confirmation of the date and never received a reply. In fact, I began to think that she did not arrive in the city, since I hadn't heard from her. I just checked my email before writing this, and I still have no posts from her. If this incident blows my credibility on this board, I will certainly understand everyones' feelings and will stop contributing, but I fully intended to see her today and was disappointed that we had, what I still believe, was a communication breakdown.

[frog]

Maybe they saw OCharley?

[Ozzy]

i've seen people that i've also been told i didn't......


because i don't use my name when i meet people for this damn reason. sometimes it does come out and sometimes like this past week, when i was told i(ozzy) was just there a day or so ago.....

[Ozzy]

but back to the topic...charley is great even if she tells you she has no idea who ozzy is....because i was someone else when i met her(and not vv either)....so don't waste your time asking.

[frog]

sure oz, whatever you say ;)

[GenrsMale]

Originally posted by Ozzy
but back to the topic...charley is great even if she tells you she has no idea who ozzy is....because i was someone else when i met her(and not vv either)....so don't waste your time asking.

So Ozzy.........who really is vv ????? The world wants to know..........drum roll please.........lol

[Ozzy]

val.

[frog]

veal?

[dicer5]

On the topic of people talking about seeing people and other people saying they never saw them-question is does it really matter? if you had a good time with the woman you're with, what does it matter if she saw this guy or that guy. I always assume there is truth in both what the guy says and what the woman says. Also, there are exaggerations in what the guy says and what the woman says. So, if you're heaving a great time with whoever you're seeing, it shouldn't matter who she saw or who she didn't see.

[frog]

On many matters, I agree with dicer's view. But the question "did A see B?" allows for no relativism.

[whasssup]

Guys, I can vouch for JM Curry. We have exchanged info over emails and thru phone conversations. In fact, he took me to an new incall place in the city that does not advertise. Cut the guy some slack. His posts are always sincere and forthcoming and I find his posts to be informative and honest. JM Curry is a good guy and does not deserved to be bad mouthed on the board.

[robnotbob]

whassup..who vouches for you???

rnb: lightening the mood (or trying to)

BTW I think I saw ozzy as me, or ozzy was me when I saw him, and I posted the worst review about myself.....

[whasssup]

I'm sorry. I thought I was on Utopia Guide not ***.

[jmcurry]

Whassup: Thanks for watching my back. I, too, am sadly finding UG taking on the nastier aspects of ***.

Badz: If you have a critique, let's hear it. If you would rather do this privately, I am most amenable. But just make certain that you get your facts right. If your epistemological paradigm is shaky, your argument will be as well. As an aside, lying is not my forte. The reviews I post are sincere, and the providers whom I have seen will testify to my conduct and veracity. In fact, you and I seem to share a proclivity for one particular provider. Ask her whether or not I am trustworthy. I am in this hobby for recreation and satisfaction. The last thing I care to do is argue with other hobbyists. I would rather share information, so that everyone can enjoy the best that the hobby has to offer. But when you call my integrity into question with unsubstantiated evidence, I feel the need to respond.

[badz]

.

[Edited by badz on 05-23-2001 at 10:05 PM]

[dicer5]

Originally posted by frog
On many matters, I agree with dicer's view. But the question "did A see B?" allows for no relativism.

frog,
can you elaborate on the "did A see B? allows for no relativism." are you saying that doesn't matter(which I would agree with), or are you saying it does matter to you? Just curious

[frog]

I meant that there are many different points of view, and sides to a story. So if I say that I had a good time with Ms X but you said she was terrible, we would have two divergent views, yet neither of us have to be incorrect necessarily. If, however, I said I saw Ms X (and she was great or was terrible) and Ms X says she has never seen frog, then one of us is wrong -- unless I was in disguise, like apparently jm claims to have been.

[dicer5]

frog,

i know what you're saying but what i was referring to was this. most of the arguments regarding someone seeing or not seeing someone never comes up when it refers to a woman who they had a bad time with. All the inconsistencies are always regarding woman who everyone seems to have a great time with. And then the argument surfaces about how "he never saw her bec. she said told me so" or something along those lines. What I was referring to was towards those types, where it seems to be a concensus that those women are very sweet and everyone who writes about them has a great time. So what I was referring to was, then what does it matter is A saw B or not. Instead of reflecting on the fact that the woman was everything they expected, it always deviates from that subject into accusations of this and that. I assume that there is truth and lies to both sides, the woman and guys, but I also assume that to a certain extent, that is the nature of this industry.

[guy catelli]

sorry, dicer 5. i've reread the whole thread -- and read your last post 3 times. i understand perfectly what frog is saying (not always the case ;)), but i'm not following the point you are trying to make.


[Edited by guy catelli on 03-04-2001 at 02:53 PM]

[dicer5]

gc,

let me try to explain(if i'm not clear let me know). What i'm saying is - most of the arguments I've seen here is when guys accuse of each other of lying about seeing women is that in all the cases I've read - Both sides always agree that the woman in question is a great lady and recommend her. So my point was this, what does it matter if a guys is lying or telling the truth about seeing a certain lady. If she is highly recommended from both sides, is it worth the accusations and arguments. I don't know if frog was saying he agreed or he was saying it does matter if a guy does lie. And the last point I made was(this is more my point of view), that I always think there's a certain amount of truth and lies in what a lady tells the guy she sees and what a guy may post. If this is the case, than is it worth it to get into an argument on the boards on a subject that will never really be resolved on the boards. Hope this clears up my previous posts; if not let me know.

[guy catelli]

dicer,

i understand now. actually, it's what you said the first time. but, somehow it didn't 'crystalize' until i read your restatement. thanks for taking the trouble.

guy

[frog]

dicer, I am not accusing jm to be a liar. He has explained that a different jm persona saw Charley. However, if someone does lie about seeing a provider, my future interpretations of his comments will be coloured accordingly. Example, you post about amazin' annie and how she is the bomb. Someone chimes in with a false "yeah, I saw her last month as well, awesome!!" comment. What does that say about that person? I would say this is a person desperately desiring attention and perhaps a pat on the head. Not (necessarily) evil mind you, but in constant need of reassurance and affirmation (and by the way, would be a high maintenance significant other). How is this wrong you ask? Well, it skews the votes for that provider. If there are NO dissents, then perhaps the point is moot, but it will still present an inaccurate view.

btw, the fact that someone uses multiple personae also makes me have certain biases on his words.

Sorry to take up so much space but you questioned.

[dicer5]

frog,

Now I understand where you are coming from and do get your point of view.

[boris]

After all this, did any of you actually see her in March? :}

I noticed that she's getting ready to tour again and may be coming through New York.